Rejects Rs 1-200cr turnover-filter for giving absurd results, declines additional ground admission | TP Taxsutra

Rejects Rs 1-200cr turnover-filter for giving absurd results, declines additional ground admission

Conclusion

ITAT rules on selection of comparables for assessee providing contract software design and development services to AE for AY 2006-07, excludes 3 comparables applying 15% RPT filter...

Already a Subscriber?

Log in for complete access.

Log In

Queries?

Contact Kalpana J at +91 98200 47188
Email - sales@taxsutra.com

Related Stories

ITAT: Retains comparables with turnover exceeding Rs. 800 Cr despite assessee’s Rs. 20 Cr turnover, distinguishes Pentair HC-ruling
ITAT: Directs exclusion of 14 companies as comparables following NXP Semiconductors ratio
ITAT: Excludes 3 companies applying ten times turnover filter; Follows McAfee ruling
ITAT: Upholds application of turnover filter of 10 times assessee's filter & 15% RPT filter
ITAT: Applies 10 times turnover filter to exclude 6 comparables for ITES-provider; Follows precedents
ITAT: Rejects application of Rs 1-200cr turnover filter, rejects CIT(A)'s exclusion of 7 comparables
ITAT: Applies 20 times multiple as turnover filter following Pentair HC-ruling
ITAT: Fixed turnover slab gives absurd comparability results; Rejects comparables exclusion merely for high-turnover
ITAT: Allows transaction aggregation for benchmarking royalty under TNMM; Sets turnover-filter at 5 times
ITAT: Applies 10 times multiple as turnover filter for excluding comparables for software-developer
ITAT: Rejects turnover filter range of Rs.1-200 cr, suggests application of 10 times multiple
ITAT: Refuses to apply Rs 200cr upper-turnover filter; Retains Mindtree & Sasken as comparables
ITAT: Considers ‘ten times’ range for upper / lower turnover filter, disagrees with fixed-range
ITAT: Applies Rs 200cr turnover filter, follows Bom-HC Pentair ruling absent jurisdictional HC ruling
ITAT: Applies Rs.200 cr turnover filter; Turnover observation in Chryscapital ruling only "obiter dictum"
HC: Turnover a relevant factor for comparability; Upholds ITAT's order excluding high turnover companies
ITAT: Directs segmental data consideration; TP adjustment to be restricted to international transactions
HC: Mere high profit /loss cannot be basis for comparables exclusion, 10B(3) analysis must
ITAT: Can’t exclude high turnover companies when low turnover companies included as comparables
ITAT: Excludes companies developing proprietary software products and owning intangibles
ITAT: Rejects Infosys & Wipro considering enormity of turnover; Follows Agnity HC ruling
ITAT: Excludes comparables due to high turnover, ownership of intangibles and brand value
ITAT: Assessee can't contest comparable, when no objections raised before lower authorities
ITAT: Companies with huge YoY margin variation not comparable
ITAT: ITAT terms Miscellaneous Application as abuse of law, Upholds views on 'Turnover filter'
ITAT: Follows Delhi HC; High risk bearing companies like Infosys excluded
ITAT: Demonstrate turnover influencing profit of comparables, says ITAT after noting Agnity ruling
ITAT: Allows turnover filter following Agnity ruling, Refuses to apply fixed upper limit
ITAT: High risk profile comparables like infosys/satyam rejected; Follows assessee's HC ruling
ITAT: Follows Agnity ruling, high risk industry giants not comparable to captives
HC: Infosys not 'comparable' to captive IT unit, confirms ITAT ruling
ITAT: ITAT rejects assessee's high/low end services distinction for ITES comparables selection
ITAT: Turnover criteria not prescribed under TP rules for comparables selection, reiterates Mumbai ITAT
ITAT: Rejects upper turnover limit for comparables, ‘Scale concept’ inapplicable to service companies
ITAT: Upholds 17.5% mark-up for IT development services in Trilogy
ITAT: Comparables whose financial result impacted due to extraordinary circumstance like amalgamation excluded
ITAT: Rejects exclusion of super profit comparable as Indian regulations different from OECD
ITAT: Accepts comparable having 25% related party transactions, Sony India ruling not binding
ITAT: Rejects consolidated financials of comparable reporting revenues of foreign subsidiary
ITAT: ROCE not appropriate PLI, 5% benefit not a standard deduction
ITAT: TPO free to consider data which became available only after the due date of filing of return
ITAT: 5% benefit allowable as standard deduction to all assessees, irrespective of magnitude of TP adjustment
ITAT: Comparables with high risk profiles, not to be considered for determining ALP in respect of low risk profile captive unit